Although I’m interested in early art, formal art history either as books or lectures typically bores me to tears. Thankfully the Internet and open access allow me to dip in and out where and when my interests take me. Recently an article on some of the earliest plant images in prehistoric art caught my eye.
In their article “The Earliest Vegetal Motifs in Prehistoric Art” (in the December 05, 2025, issue of Journal of World Prehistory), authors Yosef Garfinkel and Sarah Krulwich note that systematic depictions first appear on painted pottery of the Halafian culture of northern Mesopotamia (roughly around the headwaters of Tigris and Euphrates) c. 6200-5500 BCE.
(They do later modify this statement with “this is one of the world’s earliest extensive uses of vegetal motifs, and the earliest in the Near East”, so I guess the jury is still out as to what is considered the earliest find we know of.)
Garfinkel and Krulwich analyzed 29 Halafian sites and surveyed of one of the regions, for a total of several tens of thousands of painted pottery sherds with various motifs. The sherds mainly included geometric patterns, but also had depictions of animals, human figures, and plants.

Among the plant imagery, Garfinkel and Krulwich focused on the ones identifiable “without hesitation”. They were able to classify the motifs into four basic categories: flowers, shrubs, branches, and trees.

Apparently, botanical motifs were used in almost all sites and were fairly popular.
Despite the fact that each site only contained a small number of sherds with botanic imagery, a meta-analysis yields interesting results. Presumably the average frequency of plant motifs on decorated sherds is around 4-6 %, and they could perhaps relate to aesthetics (instead of religious rites, for example) and to the advance of mathematical knowledge, Garfinkel and Krulwich suggest.
Whole trees are apparently the least common motif among this sample. (I suspect I would initially be hard-pressed to recognize some of these trees as trees, having grown up with very different flora.)
Some items came with two different types of plant designs, while others were decorated with plant and zoomorphic images (i.e., animals).

(Garfinkel and Krulwich also analyze the sherds from the point of view of mathematical knowledge and counting in the Halafian culture. I’m not interested in ethnomathematics, but if you are, I urge you to visit the article for their finds.)
It seems clear that these sherds from 8,000(!) years ago indicate not just a long history of competent pottery-making but also an established visual language. Considering how random overall the survival of pottery (and glass) remains over the millenia can be, it’s nice to see such a variety and richness in the decorated vessels, especially from an era we tend to (erroneously!) consider backward and dull.
Found via Pottery by Osa on Mastodon.
Images by Yosef Garfinkel and Sarah Krulwich (CC BY 4.0), mashups by Eppu Jensen
Out There highlights intriguing art, places, phenomena, flora, and fauna.






